Website Stats · Original research
Mole Catchers Website Statistics 2026
We ran automated homepage audits on 8 UK mole catchers websites — checking page speed, mobile UX, on-page SEO, structured data, contact conversion and more. Here's what we found.
Avg score
33/100
Avg page speed
186ms
Sites analysed
8
Score distribution
Good (80–100)0 sites (0%)
Okay (60–79)2 sites (25%)
Poor (0–59)6 sites (75%)
How many pass the basics
HTTPS enabled100%
Mobile viewport63%
Structured data (schema)25%
Contact form on homepage25%
Open Graph share image25%
Analytics installed38%
Most common mistakes
- No theme-color meta — plain browser chrome on mobile100% of sites
- No contact form found on homepage75% of sites
- Very few images — sparse, low-effort visuals75% of sites
- No structured data (schema.org)75% of sites
- No Open Graph image — links look blank on WhatsApp/Facebook75% of sites
- No HN heading63% of sites
- No custom web fonts — default system fonts feel dated63% of sites
- No meta description — Google writes its own63% of sites
- No analytics detected — flying blind on visitor data63% of sites
- Little to no accessibility markup (aria attributes)63% of sites
How does your site compare?
Get a free audit and see where you sit versus the mole catchers average.
Methodology: automated homepage audits by RIOT London, September 2026.
