Website Stats · Original research
Battery Storage Website Statistics 2026
We ran automated homepage audits on 6 UK battery storage websites — checking page speed, mobile UX, on-page SEO, structured data, contact conversion and more. Here's what we found.
Avg score
38/100
Avg page speed
634ms
Sites analysed
6
Score distribution
Good (80–100)0 sites (0%)
Okay (60–79)2 sites (33%)
Poor (0–59)4 sites (67%)
How many pass the basics
HTTPS enabled100%
Mobile viewport83%
Structured data (schema)50%
Contact form on homepage17%
Open Graph share image17%
Analytics installed50%
Most common mistakes
- No theme-color meta — plain browser chrome on mobile100% of sites
- No Open Graph image — links look blank on WhatsApp/Facebook83% of sites
- No contact form found on homepage83% of sites
- No custom web fonts — default system fonts feel dated83% of sites
- No meta description — Google writes its own50% of sites
- Only N% of images have alt text50% of sites
- No structured data (schema.org)50% of sites
- No analytics detected — flying blind on visitor data50% of sites
- Missing <html lang> attribute — accessibility & SEO issue50% of sites
- No external CSS stylesheet — likely unstyled or WYSIWYG outp50% of sites
How does your site compare?
Get a free audit and see where you sit versus the battery storage average.
Methodology: automated homepage audits by RIOT London, September 2026.
